If you have been directly injured by Covid-19 jabs or indirectly injured through shedding, you may become a participant in an important clinical trial potentially benefiting you and many others.
The ingredient is not patented because it is not patentable. But applications for natural ingredients, combinations and processes using these natural ingredients are patentable. Please review the patents referenced in my substack to see them for yourself.
I am very interested, and I have checked your link, but it does not describe or discern the lipid emulsification. Being as the last few years has cautioned me against lipid nano particles even if transport proteins, can you please point me to any information that explains the difference here? After learning that info, I would love to sign up for the clinical trial. Unvaxxed and much shed upon, seeing patients daily, have suffered several health challenges since.
There are no lipid nanoparticles in Nano Soma. "Nano" is a size designation indicating something is less than 1 billionth of a meter (which is very tiny). Lipid nanoparticles are a very specific type of vesicle and have nothing to do with size designation of dissolved particles. The 3 molecular weight polycosanol molecules are present in very small particles in the liquid of Nano Soma.
I would never endorse or champion a product with toxic materials like lipid nano particles so, yes, your caution is prudent. Happily, there is no issue here.
Hi, Handy. Yes, Major General Stubblebine was the highest-ranking military officer to speak out against the official 9/11 narrative.
What he said, though, was that he did not know what hit the Pentagon, but that it was not a plane. He compared the hole to one that a missile would make and said that while it could not be a plane, it could be a missile.
Later, he was sent videos and actual data documenting that it was a US missile housed in a US Airforce base in Colorado and he revealed that, as well, but that was more than a year after the actual events of 9/11.
Yes, he was a magnificent human being and a true, fearless teller of truth. That is why he was killed, but not around 9/11 truth. Nope, what they killed him for was speaking out in support of health freedom and informed consent which he said was the defining issue of the 21st Century. He was right.
How can you patent a natural ingredient?
Excellent question, Snork.
The ingredient is not patented because it is not patentable. But applications for natural ingredients, combinations and processes using these natural ingredients are patentable. Please review the patents referenced in my substack to see them for yourself.
Isn't Soma the drug they used to calm the masses and increase sexual activity in the movie 1984? (Colorized in the 70's)
Soma is, Nano Soma is not.
No thanks, not into suicide. They purposely murdered MILLIONS with these bioweapons and should be in prison.
I am very interested, and I have checked your link, but it does not describe or discern the lipid emulsification. Being as the last few years has cautioned me against lipid nano particles even if transport proteins, can you please point me to any information that explains the difference here? After learning that info, I would love to sign up for the clinical trial. Unvaxxed and much shed upon, seeing patients daily, have suffered several health challenges since.
There are no lipid nanoparticles in Nano Soma. "Nano" is a size designation indicating something is less than 1 billionth of a meter (which is very tiny). Lipid nanoparticles are a very specific type of vesicle and have nothing to do with size designation of dissolved particles. The 3 molecular weight polycosanol molecules are present in very small particles in the liquid of Nano Soma.
I would never endorse or champion a product with toxic materials like lipid nano particles so, yes, your caution is prudent. Happily, there is no issue here.
i have the greatest respect for colonel Stubbelbine. he was the first i heard declare the pentagon was hit by a bunkerbuster missle, not a plane.
Hi, Handy. Yes, Major General Stubblebine was the highest-ranking military officer to speak out against the official 9/11 narrative.
What he said, though, was that he did not know what hit the Pentagon, but that it was not a plane. He compared the hole to one that a missile would make and said that while it could not be a plane, it could be a missile.
Later, he was sent videos and actual data documenting that it was a US missile housed in a US Airforce base in Colorado and he revealed that, as well, but that was more than a year after the actual events of 9/11.
Yes, he was a magnificent human being and a true, fearless teller of truth. That is why he was killed, but not around 9/11 truth. Nope, what they killed him for was speaking out in support of health freedom and informed consent which he said was the defining issue of the 21st Century. He was right.