I castigated Steve for hiding this vital info behind a paywall. A reader sent his stack with the info in it in preview format. Now the potentially vital info is behind his paywall again. UGH!
Absolutely agree, so is Malone. They say things behind their paywalls that the rest of us are not privvy to. Controlled op, my conclusion for several reasons, this being one of them.
I am doing a deep dive on Malone the money whore. In 2014 Malone states that “we need to address unchecked population growth“!!! Who does step stool Maloney think he is God? More like Satan.
This is the dude who if anyone speaks out publically of another opinion against his then he immediately slaps a lawsuit... ie: the breggens.... A good Judge reprimanded Malone and he had to dropp the lawsuit.
I don't think so. Malone certainly is, but I don't think Kirsch is aware that he is being manipulated by others, especially Malone who appears to be his handler.
Wow! That was a great letter. So well written. There’s so many of these ultra rich fat cats that really throw their money around to impress and garner status in today’s shallow society. It’s disgusting. You really can’t trust anyone anymore which is so sad. You are a fresh breath of air and I love your moral compass. Doing the right thing is always the way to go. Blessings! 🙏🙌
I think Malone does based upon his history in the defense pharmaceutical space and his absurd lawsuits against the Breggins and Jane Ruby for millions of dollars for so-called defamation. Thank goodness that the case was dismissed.
Yeah, Kirsch talks about his friend “Billy” Gates. He couldn’t understand why Sasha felt that Billy was a bad guy. He just couldn’t accept that Billy wanted to depopulate the world. Easy to see right through Kirsch in this interview. It is for this reason I don’t follow him — because he’s a globalist NWO sympathizer.
Anyone who admires gates is lost. There is absolutely no way he hasn’t seen one or more of gate’s videos glorifying depopulation. He knows! He’s part of the club. What a loser!
Sorry, Michael, no, I don’t have a marker to provide you as it’s been many months since I saw the interview live but it made a profound impression upon me.
You got to do your homework on this one and watch the complete interview with Sasha. As far as I remember, it was not 3 hrs. The exchange between Sasha and Kirsch was about an hour or a bit more then I think other discussions and interviews followed afterwards. So, fast forward thru it. I believe it was in the first or second hour.
To give some background about the interview, Sasha’s work was gaining immense traction at the time from Substackers and others. People were starting to question why Kirsch had not yet interviewed her. And so he was ultimately pressured into doing so by his followers etc. Understand that for him to continue to ignore Sasha would’ve looked bad & made people question his integrity.
Those with a modicum of discernment will perceive in the interview that Kirsch is NOT a TRUE freedom fighter. This is evident in his voice, his facial expressions, and his words. Interesting to see Sasha kowtow somewhat to Kirsch’s incredulity about his good friend “Billy” Gates. She appeared to be out of her element when Kirsch challenged her about the globalist’s agenda of depopulation. If a person is not attuned to various subtleties then it would appear to them that Kirsch trumped Sasha & thus, they would be more willing to accept Kirsch’s premise that “Billy” is just a normal guy helping humanity thru philanthropic projects. But for those who have the capacity to look beyond the mask, Kirsch actually lost the debate with Sacha, because he thoroughly exposed himself as a snake 🐍 in the grass.
KIRSCH IS NOT A “GOOD” GUY ANY MORE THAN MALONE. This makes RFK, Jr. very suspect, and everyone else who is on his team even Edward Dowd.
I just want to bring your attention to the link provided in the first comment above. The video is not more than 2 hours. And I just fast forwarded & luckily found the discussion about “Billy” and depopulation around the 41/42 minute mark (maybe best to start at 40).
But again, I urge you and others to see the entire video to understand the very insidious nature of Steve’s arguments. Anyone whose eyes are opened should view this man in a different light after this interview.
Thanks for that and I agree completely with your assessment.
ANYONE who considers Gates a good guy (or even a "just ok" guy) and/or who is a personal friend of his, trying to position themselves as one of the leaders of the "health freedom movement" (registration pending...lol) is OBVIOUS controlled opposition.
Actually, how can they even claim they are in ANY opposition to the 'public health' tyranny apparatus.
Sasha herself is a very interesting piece of work. She has broken some truly important revelations but maybe that was her role in this (a form of Paltering operation perhaps).
Her stance on bioengineering and the outright aggressive stance she takes when anyone challenges her directly on this topic (including with me personally) has made me a bit suspicious.
Just in case you didn't come back, Dr. Rima updated the article with the cure for glaucoma:
“insulin eye drops was the first one, niacinamide was the second one with, I believe, pantothenic acid … withholding information that you did not develop, patent, control, own or have proprietary control over, but which might literally save someone’s sight with the use of Vitamins B3 and B5 or simple insulin drops does not speak very well of your character”
I agree absolutely - it’s very strange, very uncharacteristic. A huge blindspot. But eventually the public awareness on the nanotechnology is building such that Sasha & Katherine Watts (who shares the same thoughts on nanotechnology as Sasha) will be left behind.
I read the mean exchange Sasha had not only with you, but also with the initial SubStacker (Valkyrie Scott(?)) who expressed surprise at Sasha‘s inconsistency or rather the incongruency of her stance on nanotechnology. Sasha then heartily attacked the woman with essentially false claims of defamation. It was the classic Malone technique of threatening litigation to ultimately silence dissent. And she’s supposedly an “American” who believes in freedom of speech or is she still just really an Eastern bloc bully at heart?
"He has access to lots and lots of resources. There are easier ways to depopulate the world, much faster and more rapidly..This vaccine is very inefficient in terms of its killing rate..It's one per thousand. You have thirteen billion doses worldwide: you've only killed 13 million people. That is a drop in the bucket.."
These comments, clothed as 'devil's advocacy', reveal a serious sociopathic mindset.
Then he goes on to say he is aware of more effective methods to kill "massive numbers of people very quickly..so quickly you couldn't defend against it. That's what I would do if I were this evil person behind this."
What would you do, Steve?
"I don't know. I've never actually looked into it myself."
But he has discussed it with "two people who know"...
Steve didn't just refer to Gates as a guy "doing good things" but also went on to say that the 'vaccine' is not an efficient mechanism for genocide as it "only kills one in a thousand" and if Gates was really keen on genocide and given how "smart" he is and the "resources he has at his disposal" he would have taken a different route.
Here is a cut of the original video containing only that pertinent bit and which is just under 14 minutes long in total:
For me, the most telltale part was when he referred to Bill Gates as his friend “Billy”. Steve compromised his objectivity in the interview when he highlighted his very personal relationship with “Billy”. This is something that a true interviewer should never do - betray his close ties to the topic or person of discussion. But of course, Steve was never trained in journalism. Nonetheless, dispassion and detachment should prevail and guide the interviewer ALWAYS. Otherwise, the public is served a skewed version of the truth and facts.
I just viewed the clip and I remember this particular exchange between Steve and Sasha. Steve was “playing dumb”, REALLY DUMB! And this was indicated in his voice which took a very affected tone while he added an artificial inflection to some of his words and questions.
Aside from this, when Steve stated that he wanted to play “Devil’s Advocate” it seemed to me to be a Freudian slip. Yes, he really did advocate for the Devil “Billy Gates”. And why would anyone want to advocate for the Devil when he is the Father of all Lies?
Finally, it’s laughable that Steve tries to convince the audience that he’s making an earnest effort at being objective like a journalist should, but he falls far from the mark because, again, his close relationship with “Billy” predisposes him to defend “Billy” and all of “Billy’s” friends (the globalist-elites).
It amazes me that these people presenting data are only presenting data to subscribers. If their information is important to Americans why is it only to supporters. These people do not realize that America is in financial difficulties and the American public is fearful of spending money that is not completely necessary.
I have recently seen many of these so called warriors for freedom, limiting their information to a select few, similar to how the cabal works. The list keeps growing and I could list several presenters, but will not because those who are concerned can find out if they try and read some of these peoples posts. Limited information, get 7 day extension to test our information and then subscribe or you will not get the complete story of this critical information I am trying to present to those who have the money to support my efforts.
People are in dire straits and these people only want to present their data to those who have extra finances beyond what is required for living.
We know that some of you make your living by paid subscriptions but not all of us have extra money to help your cause, we would if we had the money but there is very little extra money now.
I and many other Americans live on a fixed budget and most of us are living pay check to pay check and just barely getting by.
All Americans deserve to hear the truth even if they do not have extra money to support you and your life style.
I charge for medical consultations which are specific to the patient. I do not charge for information that could save humanity. And I am most assuredly not wealthy!!!!
Well said! The first time I encountered this was when McCollough had ground breaking news that would have helped lots of people, but he put it behind a paywall. I used substack notes and tore into him. I think people should do that with Steve’s essay.
I keep my Substack free for my readers. I do post product links in my articles with hopes that my articles will be shared with others and maybe make a few bucks that way (lost my job because I refused the killshots). Most of my articles come from very gifted writers, I could never sell their journalism efforts for money. People visit my product links and I get to share other writers articles, to me that's a win win 😎
We are on the same page. I have not discussed any products yet on my substack because I was not sure it was allowed. Thank you for mentioning that.
I will do the same. Only products that I believe wholeheartedly in and know the benefit of have ever been things I would recommend. Ever.
By the way, Guy, I would love to have you on my Dr. Rima Truth Reports podcast. Please reach out to me at Dr.Rima@NaturalSolutionsFoundation.com if you are interested.
Thanks Lupa! If I can help others like Substack writers and people looking for quality health products and help myself at the same time I'm all in! Many of us have to be creative to survive while staying honest....it's all good!
Coincidence? All freedom fighters with most followers seem to be pro-ABORTION: Steve Kirsch, Bobby Kennedy, Robert Malone, Ed Dowd, Pierre Kory... and ALL of them refuse to point their fingers to the real people behind the global government: the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, and other conspicuous members of secret Satanic societies, including Freemasons.
Is it reasonable to expect that someone in favor of a "right" of the mother to hire a hitman for her unborn baby, to believe in your right to live?
Abortion is an essential part of the global extermination plan behind Agenda 2030. You can assume that anyone pro-choice is in fact a traitor to the movement, a false flag.
Steve is also pro-decarbonization, which means war-on-life based on carbon (us).
Then, show that every single person in the planet should be suing Pfizer for deliberately injecting an undisclosed carcinogenic monkey virus (SV40) into the cell nucleus of the clueless biohacked, as officially recognized by Health Canada !!!
If he doesn’t like the topic, I’d show this video (all you need is 10 secs in the middle, who doesn’t have 10 seconds for you):
(caveat about the beginning: pot destroys your brain + “Raises Risk of Heart Attack and Stroke”)
9/11: two "planes", yet the third tower (WTC7) imploded, free falling on its footprint like in a controlled demolition. It was out of reach, and all 7 World Trade Center towers needed to be rebuilt, not the closer towers not belonging to World Trade Center... and the “owner” took an insurance policy for the WTC against terrorism, just months before, when no one was taking them … he didn’t show up for work precisely on 9/11 … just as his 2 grown up siblings (they never skipped work before). The inside information about the FUTURE 9/11 event helped masons make trillions by shorting the stock exchange: the records were deleted by the SEC so they wouldn't be prosecuted !!!
Please watch all of this! Your life depends on it, because there's a plan to murder 95% of the global population by 2050… written on the masonic Georgia guide-stones: “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 … ”:
- J6: The false flag operation of the fake riot was planned, incited and guided by FBI agents, who broke into the Capitol !!! The same mason-plot was copy-pasted to disband the insurrection against the stolen elections in Brazil! All intel agencies (CIA, FBI, NSA) were founded by masons and are run by them for their own nefarious goals.
- At least since the 90s, vaccines are weaponized to reduce the population, for example:
1. Adding hCG to infertilize women: lab detected in 30 countries
2. Overpassing the FDA 10 ng limit to human DNA “contamination” by 2000%, thus causing neuro-damage (autism, asperger, tics, dyslexia in 29% of kids, etc.) and childhood cancer epidemic (n.b. leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas)
- Their main source of power apart from sin-empowered demons? NOT a coincidence that the USA left dollar convertibility to gold in 1971, precisely triggering the exponential government deficit coupled with the trade deficit and inflation.
This is the Achilles’ heel of all nations: masonic and satanic secret societies counterfeit paper money and launder trillions with which they buy Banks, seats in the Federal Reserve (the only private run Central Bank in the world), political careers and parties, puppeticians, listed corporations, media, healthcare corporations and organizations, universities, foundations, judges, etc.:
I've got the book he mentions in Dutch (pdf). Looking for translators or someone to volunteer to cut and paste in an automatic translator.
He's right on everything, except joining the Muslims just because he found many Jews within the top. There are many Christened people there as well. Anyone could become corrupted.
The way out of this mess:
1. Create an easy system for real money: private currencies/warrants based on real assets, goods, services, etc. (gold, corn, oil, distance/volume/weight transportation, labor human hour/minute, etc.)
2. Ban legal tender. Let the free markets decide which real-currencies/valuables/warrants they prefer to trade with
3. Ban paper-backed currencies (unlike real-backed ones of point 1.)
4. Enforce a Legal Banking Reserve of 100% of deposits (so banks don't create money based on air) and therefore there's no excuse for a Central Bank, because there would be no risk of bank-runs since all their loans are fully backed with deposits
President John Quincy Adams: “Masonry ought forever to be abolished. It is wrong - essentially wrong - a seed of evil, which can never produce any good.”
If you are a mason or know a mason, ask him to ask his 33° master to put in writing and sign it, who is "the great architect" and that he is not Lucifer. If he refuses, then he’ll know who he is really serving, Satan: tell him to get out of masonry NOW. Sooner or later he’ll be required to trample on a cross to get to a higher degree.
Confessions of a former mason (Serge Abad-Gallardo):
We agree on most things, but not on abortion or the central solution.
I strongly support the right of a woman to do as she likes with her body. Once the infant is safely viable, it should be her option whether she keeps it or allows someone to adopt the child, but infanticide is a crime, not an option.
As a woman, no one can tell me what to do with my body and I am not the prisoner of a conception, nor should any other woman be.
The central solution cannot be accomplished unless and until we get our nations out of the UN Death Machine. That is why the Disengaging Entirely From the UN Debacle Act now begore the US Congress is so very important. You can take action here, https://PreventGenocide2030.org, and tell your contacts, friends and neighbors to, as well.
Dr. Rima I do appreciate your insights on the Death Machine and how you have dedicated your life to exposing the depopulation agenda. Your interview with Jesse Ventura all those years ago was eye-opening.
However, I am a little confused by your position on abortion. You said that a woman can do what she likes with her body and no one can tell her what to do with it. But when the infant is safely viable--which occurs sooner and sooner during the course of pregnancy due to medical advances--you are saying that she has to allow the baby to be born because at that point terminating the pregnancy is infanticide. At that point, aren't you telling her what she can and can't do with her body? Doesn't that still make her a prisoner of conception? The only difference is the stage of development of the baby.
This is, for me, the thorny point of the argument. I am adamantly opposed to slavery of any sort, and condemning a woman to be a breeder because a conception has taken place inside her body would be enslaving her.
The fetus, not capable of external survival, has, in my view, and this is highly noxious to some people, I am aware, fewer rights than the woman.
Once the fetus is capable of external survival, killing it, as the WHO advocates, at the whim of the mother or, as California legislation makes possible, up to 28 days after birth, is no longer abortion (the mother's choice), it is infanticide.
So the mother would have a choice: deliver the viable infant prematurely, since the normal process of birth has not been initiated by the mother/baby duo or carry the baby to term and deliver then. In either of those cases, the choice is the mother's and the mother has the option after the viable infant is born, of either relinquishing parental rights (i.e., giving the baby up for adoption) or keeping the child.
There is no way that a woman would, in the world that I construct, be forced to carry a baby past healthy viability. That would, indeed, be slavery. But the moral imperative about the sanctity of the baby's life enters into the discussion once the baby is viable external to the mother without damage to the baby.
Bear in mind, of course, that keeping a baby alive with extraordinary measures when born significantly prematurely, while increasingly possible, is not what I mean by viable. Such babies are at much higher risk for life-long neurological and other damage. I am talking about normal expectation for respiratory, neurological, urological, digestive and other system function at a normal, expectable level.
Once that is achieved, the baby is, in my view, viable and now has the right to protection of its life in the way that we are discussing.
Thank you for reaffirming the reproductive rights of women!
Women all over the world should not be the prisoners of any conception.
Women all over the world should not be dictated to by anyone's religious beliefs about what they can do within their own bodily integrity.
If ppl don't begin to understand that we need to stand together against this globocap/UN Death Machine w/o debating religious beliefs imposed upon other ppl, we are all going down with the ship!
Dr. Rima, I can't thank you enough for all the good things you do!
A woman can do whatever she wants with her body, except injuring/mutilating herself and committing suicide, right?
But since conception, there's a different living human being in her body, with his/her own DNA, sex, and immortal soul:
You'll start to find answers in Near Death Experiences. Consciousness, intelligence, will, are all spiritual properties of the spiritual immortal soul. How do we know that? some of the blind from birth see in colors for the first time when they are brain dead (no electricity, no activity, no bloodflow, no oxygen) and also no heartbeat and no breathing. The same happens with some of the deaf: they listen for the first time to conversations around or if they go up, even celestial music!
"God is love" says the Bible, the Word of God (1 John 4:7-12) Do you believe in love? then you believe in God. How do you prove love to yourself? If you prove love, you prove God! There’s no love without God, the source of all true love. He’s not only the love of my life, He’s the life of my love!
Jesus said “I’m... the life.” (John 14:16)
“God gives life to everything.” (1 Timothy 6, 13)
Do you believe in life? You prove life, you prove God, eternal life, source of all life:
That is where you should start your journey of discovery, but first pray: "God, life of my love, if you exist, please show me the way to find the bliss of knowing You"
or even better:
Think this with your heart: “Jesus, if you are the Son of God, I consecrate my heart to your Heart. Please send me the Holy Spirit so I can see Truth and have the courage to convert and follow Him wherever He leads”
Mathematical proof of God’s mind
Who could have imagined that mathematical images could be so beautiful?:
Hey, Prof, I am sure you mean well, but it is rather presumptuous to tell me where to "start my journey of discovery" and to tell me how and what to pray.
You have no data on which to base what I know or do not know simply because we disagree. And, to be very clear, while I respect your belief system, I do not agree with it.
Let me repeat: my body is not enslave-able because of a conception. If I choose to shelter that conception and invite a child to continue to live in that body, that is my right.
If I choose not to do so, that is my supervening right.
To me, that is essential health freedom: NO ONE can dictate what happens to my body or I am a slave. That is utterly binary: either yes or no. And for you, it is yes. For me it is no.
There is nothing in between.
We agree on much We disagree on that and will continue to do so unless and until you alter your position.
“there are characteristic features that are commonly observed in NDEs. These characteristics include a perception of seeing and hearing apart from the physical body, passing into or through a tunnel, encountering a mystical light, intense and generally positive emotions, a review of part or all of their prior life experiences, encountering deceased loved ones, and a choice to return to their earthly life.”
You define personhood from the moment of viability. That doesn't pass the test of being human with human rights:
1. Imagine you have an accident and you wouldn't be viable without ICU. Would that mean you lose personhood and human rights?
Now imagine the same accident 100 years ago: why would you be a person today and not then, considering you are the same living being?
2. The same argument applies to the unborn. Imagine in 100 years you could have external viability since conception (a perfect artificial uterus): it makes no philosophical sense to say that under the same level of development, an unborn baby is onthologycally, a living human being with human rights, depending only on the tech.
Even more evident. A 8 month pregnancy means there's no person in an Amazon jungle tribe, but there is a person in NYC?
Returning to the main topic, RFK2 and newcomers working together, like Ed Dowd, Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch, all share the same blind belief/creed that the COVID response problems were only due to business-as-usual involving regulatory capture. Suspiciously, they all reject conspiracy facts, the long haul explanation showing this was just one of many plandemics and vaccine attacks to cull the population, and that their real power started to grow exponentially when leaving the gold standard and counterfeiting currency1, trillions, with which they bought everything, puppeticians, listed stocks, land, etc. Unless they wake-up, they create dissent and debilitate the movement, because they don’t promote root-solutions, just palliative care. Our enemies are winning the war by exhausting us in skirmishes, while they advance behind and corner us to death.
No, Prof, you have no data about MY spiritual position, experience, awareness or involvement. Telling me where to start supposes you know where I am.
You don't.
And no one, no matter whom they might be to the world, to God or to the woman in whose body a conception has occurred, can tell the woman that someone else now owns her body and can use it against her will.
There are, at least in my mind, absolute, fundamental principles and the ultimate evil and unacceptability of slavery, reproductive or otherwise, is one of them.
Make all the arguments you like, but it ultimately comes down to that: are you willing to enslave women on your behalf or someone else's or are you not?
If you are, we have nothing further to discuss. If you are not, then you have no strength to your argument about reproductive slavery so we have nothing further to discuss in that regard, either.
I am willing to chat with you, but all of your arguments center around the willingness to countenance slavery. I don't.
It's not about slavery of the mother, but about due mercy. Imagine a female scientist in the North Pole living alone. A chopper leaves her the supplies.
Now, the little daughter of the scientist, who was staying with her father back home, had sneaked in the chopper and then into the base. The divorced father had custody because the scientist preferred to focus on her career, but the girl missed her mom. The chopper left. No way it could return until 9 months.
1. Does the scientist have a right to kick her daughter out of the base, causing her sure death?
2. Would keeping her daughter until the chopper's return mean that she is a slave of her daughter or the father?
3. Why is it that in every single country of the world, the scientist would be guilty of murder by abandoning her daughter, because abandoning anybody to death is a crime everywhere in the world and even worse if the person is a relative, and worst of worse, if the abandoned is a relative where you have obligation to care for, like a daughter or mother?
A definition of slavery is to treat a living human being like a thing.
Isn’t abortion a type of slavery, where the mother decides that a living human being is a thing and that she has the right to ask someone to stop the heart of the “thing”, which by the way is her daughter/son?
There no such thing as a "thing", when in time, the “thing” has a beating human heart, which could keep alive a human being!
So, in fact, being pro-abortion means being pro-slavery, and the real abolitionists are the pro-lifers. Pro-choice means choosing slavery, murder and genocide, in that order.
Fred, women are tired of ppl/men imposing their religious views upon their lives.
I am also tired of zealots like you turning discussions on substack into your personal rant abt what women should do, complete w bibl quotes of course.
This substack is abt Dr Rima's excellent reply to $teve K so why not stick to the subj?
BTW, there are many ways that ppl like you who care abt children can better utilize your energy like reorg foster care, expand adoption services, stop the questionable gender care surgeries on children.
Get out of your rut and do some work to help the living breathing children who are here now instead of worrying abt zygotes in women's wombs that are really not your bizness.
A girlfriend of my late wife simply cured her glaucoma in a couple of months with daily, bowel-tolerance intake of bioflavonoid vitamin C powder. Anecdotal, not clinical I know, but worthwhile info. I'm underwhelmed by allopathic approaches. And I see a game of opportunism with medicos rehashing Covid info and such.
So many Substack expert opinion types sell product. Everyone has to survive, but some stars like Mercola surely make more with their paywalls than they did before losing their practice. It seems a few diligent Substack researchers don't have time to make business on Substack. And over the past year or so, Substack seems to corral like-minded folks into echo chambers. Latypova's recent post re Stripe is disconcerting.
I ran across Substack about two years ago and find it enlightening after sorting the stacks for what I like. It's now my media. The Comment sections are amazing with interesting people and links, and few trolls. There's a handful of Stubstackers I'd like to monetize but I'm retired now on Social Security basically. You've joined this handful.
Just think, war resistance in the Vietnam era was virtually organized person to person, coffee shop to coffee shop, and by landline telephones, local pulps, and so forth, and finally began to intimidate Nixon. Shiva's offline approach with bumper stickers and fliers grabbed me as feasible and even necessary under increasing techno tyranny.
You fight from bottom up. You're a real rally the troops person. Your voice has the ring of experience and autonomy. I sent out the first missive I found of yours to my private e-blast of about a hundred and got positive response, hopefully bringing in some subscribers. Respect
Thank you, Rohjo! I am a rally the troops person. The troops are where the power is. The Generals are nothing without the power and loyalty of the troops.
Yes, humanity did not have the internet for most of its history and word from trusted person to trusted person is critically important.
You know, I closed my practice of drug free medicine, to which people came from around the world for my help, to take on, and derail the globalist depopulation and enslavement agenda in 2004.
This is NOT a good business plan, but it is a good plan to save humanity.
It is critically important to get our country out of the UN Death Machine, which you can do by supporting the Disengaging Entirely From the UN Debacle Act now before Congress. Go to https://PreventGenocide2030.org to do that and then share the link as far as you can.
When you say ‘cured her glaucoma’ what do you mean? Lowered her interocular pressure? Improved her visual fields? Thickened her optic nerve? I have had glaucoma for nearly 50 years. I am almost 100% convinced interocular pressures follow from glaucoma. They are not causative. IMO. I am not convinced lowering them is helpful.
PS I saw your interest in Ayurveda, which I share. Here's a clip from a friend in LA who salvaged her birthing experience by ignoring her doctors and heeding "studies out of India." Shannon is very active in all-faiths based advocacy of religious exemptions to the jab.
Sorry I can't be more helpful. My wife passed away two years ago and I don't have her friend's contact. I remember that this person's vision cleared to her satisfaction, using only vitamin C. She was ecstatic to avoid other interventions, but I don't recall the details. I suppose a regimen of vit C might help you and couldn't hurt.
Thanks. I attribute her passing to iatrogenesis, a common cause. I'm well and as happy as can be expected in this new crazy movie on the planet. All the best to you in your own journey. I think Ayurveda, Unani Tibb, classical Asian approaches, homeopathy, and folk practices are all antidotes to Rockefeller medicine.
Nice pair of visual input devices ya got there, Pilgrim...it'd sure be a damned shame if something was to happen to them...if you get my d(g)rift. For as little as a fiver per month I can offer ya protection. (Bugsy Malone channeling John Wayne in True Gri(f)t.)
If I ever post a comment that you'd rather have vanish, I'll be happy to cancel/delete it if you think its sarcasm or satire makes the risk/benefit ratio too high. Or just delete it on your own, if your Substack dashboard lets you do that.
Thank You for this post! Steve's level of greed is totally disgusting. May he reap his just reward. Or better yet may he change his ways. You Dr Rima are amazing
Thank you for saying this. I too am appalled that he put this eyesight saving news behind a paywall.
This is true.
"because once vision is lost, it can be very hard to restore.
Once retinal cells die they rarely if ever rejuvenate, but he claims that the supplements can restore vision. That’s selling false hope to millions who have lost eyesight from many disorders. I have worked in retinal ophthalmology since 1980 and with some of the best doctors in the field. Too bad I can’t read comments to see what he said, the product and whether people are falling for it.
I’m thoroughly disgusted with what he’s doing. Especially since he doesn’t need money.
Even if he did need money, this should be put out and then he should ask for donations if he wants to.
I once got a donation of a single very old, very often fingered $1 bill. With it, on a sheet of white paper was a grey wash, utterly magnificent drawing of a horse. Another piece of paper said, unsigned, "This is all I can give you but I want you to know how much what you are doing means to me."
That wasn't because of a paywall. That was a gift of inestimable value that touched General Bert and me deeply.
That was the most precious dollar I ever got.
How about if we use money like that, instead of as a tool of extortion, which is what Steve set up for his price-limited information.
I certainly cannot afford subscription to multiple substance. I just figure that both Kirsch and Malone are controlling the narrative behind their paywalls.
Beware the hand picked "alternative" voices. Where was Steve in 2009 when you flew in to warn Jessee Ventura about the nightmare of the past four years? Democrat party fundraising maybe. Still in Panama? New here. Welcome to substack Rima.
I do not know where he was then but I know where we are now and if we are not focused on getting out of the UN Death Machine, we are acquiescing to our destruction.
Go to https://PreventGenocide2030.org and take the action there in support of the Act before Congress to get us out of that slaughter house.
It's right on the home page. Then share like crazy.
I have felt the same way about substack subscriptions and inability to comment without paying for it. I keep mine free for that reason. I will have to charge for my book which is customary for such a product and fair I think, for how much work goes into it.
I quit my healthcare job over the jabs, I have no money for subscriptions either.
I remember Kirsch proudly stating on his Twitter account how he offered a lady on a plane that was sitting next to him 10K on the spot if she took off her mask. I personally found it creepy...
Which is dumb anyway. Diseases come and go, flare up/flare down. People eat four bananas one day and if their medical test says their pressures were less they tell people ‘I think eating a lot of bananas really helped my interocular pressures’.
Have I told you lately that I love you? No? Well, I really, really do.
Steve Kirsch attracted my attention early on in my work here on Substack. I realised he was a weird combination of grifter, authoritarian and controlled opposition operative.
He is protecting his industry and his millions. I find him quite repugnant for many reasons but concealing useful information behind paywalls is especially vile.
Thank you so much for giving him the benefit of your fantastic advice. You are ever the mistress of subtlety and pointed education in morality. xx
Unsubscribed a long time ago from his unpaid substack. He is controlled opposition just like Malone in my opinion. Both super rich men. Part of the new dream team of pharma pushers along with other drs. Steve believed in vaccines and probably still wants safe ones just like RFK Jr. Bret Weinstein is another one. Can't stand him. In his Tucker interview, he was trying to talk briefly about WHO and UN and about their control and that we need to leave. Everywhere I could I said Dr Rima and James are the ones that deserve credit for telling the world for almost 2 years, not Bret. The group that everyone wants to hate, big pharma, they all push so much. Ivermectin is a pharma drug. George Webb has some interesting information on Malone. Thanks Dr Rima for speaking the truth.
Wow, what a list of proof. Incredible work. You should contact George Webb too and I question him too, btw. He took one of the vaccines which stunned his audience. He is on The Duke show with Peter a lot whom didn't take the vaccine. I had all my alerts out about people in 2020 as I was too aware of the agenda. So I questioned everything and still do. I don't really follow anybody, but some journalists that I knew before covid and some podcasts people now about the constitution. I am learning as much as possible about the constitution and how we can use it to our benefit. My journey started because of cancer and my daughters and son having too many health issues that I never imagined . Later my husband almost died from too many meds a dr prescribed. I have very little respect for big pharma or anybody pushing it. I have recently learned a bunch of truth about alternative meds too that stunned me. It's a man that does substack articles too. The world is truly upside down and I want to live my life as free as possible. Thank you and keep up the great work.
Personally I think he is a form of control opposition. Saw an interview with him and he thinks gates a great guy. Recommend to watch this interview from 8mths ago. Will open your eyes. I hope you will get the point. https://rumble.com/v2ncy5c-full-episode-76-whose-military-made-covid.html
Absolutely agree, so is Malone. They say things behind their paywalls that the rest of us are not privvy to. Controlled op, my conclusion for several reasons, this being one of them.
Agree with you also. I don't trust malone.
I am doing a deep dive on Malone the money whore. In 2014 Malone states that “we need to address unchecked population growth“!!! Who does step stool Maloney think he is God? More like Satan.
This is the dude who if anyone speaks out publically of another opinion against his then he immediately slaps a lawsuit... ie: the breggens.... A good Judge reprimanded Malone and he had to dropp the lawsuit.
I don't think so. Malone certainly is, but I don't think Kirsch is aware that he is being manipulated by others, especially Malone who appears to be his handler.
Wow! That was a great letter. So well written. There’s so many of these ultra rich fat cats that really throw their money around to impress and garner status in today’s shallow society. It’s disgusting. You really can’t trust anyone anymore which is so sad. You are a fresh breath of air and I love your moral compass. Doing the right thing is always the way to go. Blessings! 🙏🙌
I don't think either of them are necessarily entirely aware - that they are being used or are acting as Controlled Op.
I think Malone does based upon his history in the defense pharmaceutical space and his absurd lawsuits against the Breggins and Jane Ruby for millions of dollars for so-called defamation. Thank goodness that the case was dismissed.
Yes, serves him right for trying to sue them for $25m.
Yeah, Kirsch talks about his friend “Billy” Gates. He couldn’t understand why Sasha felt that Billy was a bad guy. He just couldn’t accept that Billy wanted to depopulate the world. Easy to see right through Kirsch in this interview. It is for this reason I don’t follow him — because he’s a globalist NWO sympathizer.
Beautifully stated, thankyou!
🎯
Anyone who admires gates is lost. There is absolutely no way he hasn’t seen one or more of gate’s videos glorifying depopulation. He knows! He’s part of the club. What a loser!
I don't trust him either. I'm going to watch that, thank you Tan.
Yes, he is part of the "tide change" side of the Freemason control system.
Do you have the specific timestamp by any chance? It's a 2 hour long video
Sorry, Michael, no, I don’t have a marker to provide you as it’s been many months since I saw the interview live but it made a profound impression upon me.
You got to do your homework on this one and watch the complete interview with Sasha. As far as I remember, it was not 3 hrs. The exchange between Sasha and Kirsch was about an hour or a bit more then I think other discussions and interviews followed afterwards. So, fast forward thru it. I believe it was in the first or second hour.
To give some background about the interview, Sasha’s work was gaining immense traction at the time from Substackers and others. People were starting to question why Kirsch had not yet interviewed her. And so he was ultimately pressured into doing so by his followers etc. Understand that for him to continue to ignore Sasha would’ve looked bad & made people question his integrity.
Those with a modicum of discernment will perceive in the interview that Kirsch is NOT a TRUE freedom fighter. This is evident in his voice, his facial expressions, and his words. Interesting to see Sasha kowtow somewhat to Kirsch’s incredulity about his good friend “Billy” Gates. She appeared to be out of her element when Kirsch challenged her about the globalist’s agenda of depopulation. If a person is not attuned to various subtleties then it would appear to them that Kirsch trumped Sasha & thus, they would be more willing to accept Kirsch’s premise that “Billy” is just a normal guy helping humanity thru philanthropic projects. But for those who have the capacity to look beyond the mask, Kirsch actually lost the debate with Sacha, because he thoroughly exposed himself as a snake 🐍 in the grass.
KIRSCH IS NOT A “GOOD” GUY ANY MORE THAN MALONE. This makes RFK, Jr. very suspect, and everyone else who is on his team even Edward Dowd.
Michael,
I just want to bring your attention to the link provided in the first comment above. The video is not more than 2 hours. And I just fast forwarded & luckily found the discussion about “Billy” and depopulation around the 41/42 minute mark (maybe best to start at 40).
But again, I urge you and others to see the entire video to understand the very insidious nature of Steve’s arguments. Anyone whose eyes are opened should view this man in a different light after this interview.
Thanks for that and I agree completely with your assessment.
ANYONE who considers Gates a good guy (or even a "just ok" guy) and/or who is a personal friend of his, trying to position themselves as one of the leaders of the "health freedom movement" (registration pending...lol) is OBVIOUS controlled opposition.
Actually, how can they even claim they are in ANY opposition to the 'public health' tyranny apparatus.
Sasha herself is a very interesting piece of work. She has broken some truly important revelations but maybe that was her role in this (a form of Paltering operation perhaps).
Her stance on bioengineering and the outright aggressive stance she takes when anyone challenges her directly on this topic (including with me personally) has made me a bit suspicious.
Maybe I'm just paranoid....
Just in case you didn't come back, Dr. Rima updated the article with the cure for glaucoma:
“insulin eye drops was the first one, niacinamide was the second one with, I believe, pantothenic acid … withholding information that you did not develop, patent, control, own or have proprietary control over, but which might literally save someone’s sight with the use of Vitamins B3 and B5 or simple insulin drops does not speak very well of your character”
Here's the absolute proof:
Depopulation or EXTERMINATION? (finest quotes):
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depopulation-or-extermination
Confessions of illuminati, David Rockefeller (finest quotes):
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/david-rockefeller-illuminati
Ex illuminati Ronald Bernard: how the world REALLY works
22 Aug 2017 Original in Dutch with English subs:
https://odysee.com/@QuantumRhino:9/Revelations-by-an-Insider--The-Ronald-Bernard-Interviews--Part-1-5:5
I agree absolutely - it’s very strange, very uncharacteristic. A huge blindspot. But eventually the public awareness on the nanotechnology is building such that Sasha & Katherine Watts (who shares the same thoughts on nanotechnology as Sasha) will be left behind.
I read the mean exchange Sasha had not only with you, but also with the initial SubStacker (Valkyrie Scott(?)) who expressed surprise at Sasha‘s inconsistency or rather the incongruency of her stance on nanotechnology. Sasha then heartily attacked the woman with essentially false claims of defamation. It was the classic Malone technique of threatening litigation to ultimately silence dissent. And she’s supposedly an “American” who believes in freedom of speech or is she still just really an Eastern bloc bully at heart?
"He has access to lots and lots of resources. There are easier ways to depopulate the world, much faster and more rapidly..This vaccine is very inefficient in terms of its killing rate..It's one per thousand. You have thirteen billion doses worldwide: you've only killed 13 million people. That is a drop in the bucket.."
These comments, clothed as 'devil's advocacy', reveal a serious sociopathic mindset.
Then he goes on to say he is aware of more effective methods to kill "massive numbers of people very quickly..so quickly you couldn't defend against it. That's what I would do if I were this evil person behind this."
What would you do, Steve?
"I don't know. I've never actually looked into it myself."
But he has discussed it with "two people who know"...
Kirsch is a very slippery character.
Indeed!
I found the segment!
Steve didn't just refer to Gates as a guy "doing good things" but also went on to say that the 'vaccine' is not an efficient mechanism for genocide as it "only kills one in a thousand" and if Gates was really keen on genocide and given how "smart" he is and the "resources he has at his disposal" he would have taken a different route.
Here is a cut of the original video containing only that pertinent bit and which is just under 14 minutes long in total:
https://rumble.com/v4d3j5w-steve-kirsch-expressing-some-interesting-views-on-bill-gates.html
Kirch is an outright Psycho...not much better than Gates himself!
For me, the most telltale part was when he referred to Bill Gates as his friend “Billy”. Steve compromised his objectivity in the interview when he highlighted his very personal relationship with “Billy”. This is something that a true interviewer should never do - betray his close ties to the topic or person of discussion. But of course, Steve was never trained in journalism. Nonetheless, dispassion and detachment should prevail and guide the interviewer ALWAYS. Otherwise, the public is served a skewed version of the truth and facts.
I just viewed the clip and I remember this particular exchange between Steve and Sasha. Steve was “playing dumb”, REALLY DUMB! And this was indicated in his voice which took a very affected tone while he added an artificial inflection to some of his words and questions.
Aside from this, when Steve stated that he wanted to play “Devil’s Advocate” it seemed to me to be a Freudian slip. Yes, he really did advocate for the Devil “Billy Gates”. And why would anyone want to advocate for the Devil when he is the Father of all Lies?
Finally, it’s laughable that Steve tries to convince the audience that he’s making an earnest effort at being objective like a journalist should, but he falls far from the mark because, again, his close relationship with “Billy” predisposes him to defend “Billy” and all of “Billy’s” friends (the globalist-elites).
It amazes me that these people presenting data are only presenting data to subscribers. If their information is important to Americans why is it only to supporters. These people do not realize that America is in financial difficulties and the American public is fearful of spending money that is not completely necessary.
I have recently seen many of these so called warriors for freedom, limiting their information to a select few, similar to how the cabal works. The list keeps growing and I could list several presenters, but will not because those who are concerned can find out if they try and read some of these peoples posts. Limited information, get 7 day extension to test our information and then subscribe or you will not get the complete story of this critical information I am trying to present to those who have the money to support my efforts.
People are in dire straits and these people only want to present their data to those who have extra finances beyond what is required for living.
We know that some of you make your living by paid subscriptions but not all of us have extra money to help your cause, we would if we had the money but there is very little extra money now.
I and many other Americans live on a fixed budget and most of us are living pay check to pay check and just barely getting by.
All Americans deserve to hear the truth even if they do not have extra money to support you and your life style.
I could not agree more.
I charge for medical consultations which are specific to the patient. I do not charge for information that could save humanity. And I am most assuredly not wealthy!!!!
Well said! The first time I encountered this was when McCollough had ground breaking news that would have helped lots of people, but he put it behind a paywall. I used substack notes and tore into him. I think people should do that with Steve’s essay.
I agree. Go for it. You can reference this one.
I did. I don’t know if people can reply to substack notes, but it’s out there.
Absolutely. Especially with what we're dealing with. This is about humanity-like wtf????
For us. What is it about for him?
I keep my Substack free for my readers. I do post product links in my articles with hopes that my articles will be shared with others and maybe make a few bucks that way (lost my job because I refused the killshots). Most of my articles come from very gifted writers, I could never sell their journalism efforts for money. People visit my product links and I get to share other writers articles, to me that's a win win 😎
We are on the same page. I have not discussed any products yet on my substack because I was not sure it was allowed. Thank you for mentioning that.
I will do the same. Only products that I believe wholeheartedly in and know the benefit of have ever been things I would recommend. Ever.
By the way, Guy, I would love to have you on my Dr. Rima Truth Reports podcast. Please reach out to me at Dr.Rima@NaturalSolutionsFoundation.com if you are interested.
That is a good point to remember, that many writers are on substack bc they were axed when they refused the jabb.
I like your willingness to find ways to use your stak to make a little $ via ads rather than going the paywall route.
Thanks Lupa! If I can help others like Substack writers and people looking for quality health products and help myself at the same time I'm all in! Many of us have to be creative to survive while staying honest....it's all good!
Steve left enough clues for anyone with medical scientific training to find the 2 methods.
I'll post them tomorrow for free:
https://ScientificProgress.substack.com
Coincidence? All freedom fighters with most followers seem to be pro-ABORTION: Steve Kirsch, Bobby Kennedy, Robert Malone, Ed Dowd, Pierre Kory... and ALL of them refuse to point their fingers to the real people behind the global government: the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, and other conspicuous members of secret Satanic societies, including Freemasons.
Is it reasonable to expect that someone in favor of a "right" of the mother to hire a hitman for her unborn baby, to believe in your right to live?
Abortion is an essential part of the global extermination plan behind Agenda 2030. You can assume that anyone pro-choice is in fact a traitor to the movement, a false flag.
Steve is also pro-decarbonization, which means war-on-life based on carbon (us).
The REAL Robert Malone, son of a Deep State:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-real-robert-malone
What’s your best way to wake-up those who don’t want to open their eyes?
Please share your most effective wake-up strategies.
The more the awakened, the sooner this nightmare will be over!
If the person doesn’t want to discuss injections, then food is a good start:
Why is food poisoning legal?
How Rumsfeld forced the approval of Aspartame.
Artificial sweeteners, MSG, PFAS, Glyphosate ... go organic!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/why-is-food-poisoning-legal
Then I’d follow with "Are you opened to see if the actual data matches your opinion?"
Then I start showing some of the shortcomings of the Pharma industry:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/system-failure-ai-exposes-zero-government
Then, show that every single person in the planet should be suing Pfizer for deliberately injecting an undisclosed carcinogenic monkey virus (SV40) into the cell nucleus of the clueless biohacked, as officially recognized by Health Canada !!!
If he doesn’t like the topic, I’d show this video (all you need is 10 secs in the middle, who doesn’t have 10 seconds for you):
https://odysee.com/@ImpossiblyWackedOutWorld:f/WTC-7-Free-Falling:8
(caveat about the beginning: pot destroys your brain + “Raises Risk of Heart Attack and Stroke”)
9/11: two "planes", yet the third tower (WTC7) imploded, free falling on its footprint like in a controlled demolition. It was out of reach, and all 7 World Trade Center towers needed to be rebuilt, not the closer towers not belonging to World Trade Center... and the “owner” took an insurance policy for the WTC against terrorism, just months before, when no one was taking them … he didn’t show up for work precisely on 9/11 … just as his 2 grown up siblings (they never skipped work before). The inside information about the FUTURE 9/11 event helped masons make trillions by shorting the stock exchange: the records were deleted by the SEC so they wouldn't be prosecuted !!!
Watch amazing short and more evidence here:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/911-2-planes-3-towers
Please watch all of this! Your life depends on it, because there's a plan to murder 95% of the global population by 2050… written on the masonic Georgia guide-stones: “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 … ”:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depopulation-or-extermination
- J6: The false flag operation of the fake riot was planned, incited and guided by FBI agents, who broke into the Capitol !!! The same mason-plot was copy-pasted to disband the insurrection against the stolen elections in Brazil! All intel agencies (CIA, FBI, NSA) were founded by masons and are run by them for their own nefarious goals.
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/j6-what-you-need-to-know
It's such a mason manual that they organized the same J6 play in Brazil when it was proven that the voting machines owned by mason Soros, were rigged:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-2020-american-coup
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/dominion-over-us
- At least since the 90s, vaccines are weaponized to reduce the population, for example:
1. Adding hCG to infertilize women: lab detected in 30 countries
2. Overpassing the FDA 10 ng limit to human DNA “contamination” by 2000%, thus causing neuro-damage (autism, asperger, tics, dyslexia in 29% of kids, etc.) and childhood cancer epidemic (n.b. leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas)
Check soundchoice.org or videos at bottom after this page:
100 wake-up videos:
(don't miss the 1st one, 10 min at 2x, an amazing tool to start a discussion):
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/wake-up-videos
- COVID was designed as a primer for even more lethal COVID haccines:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-real-covid-timeline
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/not-vaccine-not-gene-therapy-just
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/what-do-bioweapons-have-to-do-with
- You’ll go nowhere and you’ll be happy:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/2050-youll-go-nowhere-and-youll-be
- It's genocide for depopulation:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depop-vaccines-no-myth
- Their main source of power apart from sin-empowered demons? NOT a coincidence that the USA left dollar convertibility to gold in 1971, precisely triggering the exponential government deficit coupled with the trade deficit and inflation.
This is the Achilles’ heel of all nations: masonic and satanic secret societies counterfeit paper money and launder trillions with which they buy Banks, seats in the Federal Reserve (the only private run Central Bank in the world), political careers and parties, puppeticians, listed corporations, media, healthcare corporations and organizations, universities, foundations, judges, etc.:
Depopulation or EXTERMINATION? (finest quotes):
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depopulation-or-extermination
Confessions of illuminati, David Rockefeller (finest quotes):
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/david-rockefeller-illuminati
Ex illuminati Ronald Bernard: how the world REALLY works
22 Aug 2017 Original in Dutch with English subs:
https://odysee.com/@QuantumRhino:9/Revelations-by-an-Insider--The-Ronald-Bernard-Interviews--Part-1-5:5
I've got the book he mentions in Dutch (pdf). Looking for translators or someone to volunteer to cut and paste in an automatic translator.
He's right on everything, except joining the Muslims just because he found many Jews within the top. There are many Christened people there as well. Anyone could become corrupted.
The way out of this mess:
1. Create an easy system for real money: private currencies/warrants based on real assets, goods, services, etc. (gold, corn, oil, distance/volume/weight transportation, labor human hour/minute, etc.)
2. Ban legal tender. Let the free markets decide which real-currencies/valuables/warrants they prefer to trade with
3. Ban paper-backed currencies (unlike real-backed ones of point 1.)
4. Enforce a Legal Banking Reserve of 100% of deposits (so banks don't create money based on air) and therefore there's no excuse for a Central Bank, because there would be no risk of bank-runs since all their loans are fully backed with deposits
Anything else you might think of?
Now, are you really ready for this?:
The full PLAN exposed:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison
President John Quincy Adams: “Masonry ought forever to be abolished. It is wrong - essentially wrong - a seed of evil, which can never produce any good.”
If you are a mason or know a mason, ask him to ask his 33° master to put in writing and sign it, who is "the great architect" and that he is not Lucifer. If he refuses, then he’ll know who he is really serving, Satan: tell him to get out of masonry NOW. Sooner or later he’ll be required to trample on a cross to get to a higher degree.
Confessions of a former mason (Serge Abad-Gallardo):
https://www.ncregister.com/interview/confessions-of-a-former-freemason-officer-converted-to-catholicism
Confession of 33rd degree master mason - Masons worship deities/demons
https://rumble.com/v294ksc-words-from-33rd-degree-master-mason-rare-video-masons-worship-all-sorts-of-.html
Masonry's Satanic Connection
https://odysee.com/@HiddenTruths:c/Masonry's-Satanic-Connection:4
Masonry's Satanic Doctrine | From Their Own Books
https://rumble.com/v2wg24a-masonrys-satanic-doctrine-from-their-own-books.html
Do Freemasons Worship Lucifer？ Evidence They Don't Want You To See
https://odysee.com/@John_4-14:a/Do-Freemasons-Worship-Lucifer%EF%BC%9F-Evidence-They-Don't-Want-You-To-See-%EF%BD%9C-Hidden-Agendas---Walter-Veith:0
Satanic Ritual Abuse and Secret Societies [1995] [VHS]
https://odysee.com/@thisworldworks:1/satanic-ritual-abuse-and-secret-societies-1995:3
Satanic Pedophilia Torture and Blood - Dark Satanic Secrets Revealed
https://odysee.com/@Gmail.com:52/822821884_Satanic-Pedophilia-Torture-and-Blood---Dark-Satanic-Secrets-Revealed:4
UNITED NATIONS LUCIFER AND THE LUCIFER TRUST
https://odysee.com/@dynosarus:c/UNITED-NATIONS-LUCIFER-AND-THE-LUCIFER-TRUST:4
Freemasonry: 100% incompatible with Christ
https://rumble.com/vs9mxb-heres-why-christianity-is-totally-incapatable-with-freemasonry.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nljuLLGpi3s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL5BC-Xc50s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddWB4rcChhk
or rumble:
https://rumble.com/vf9zeh-freemasons-exposed.html
Obama pushing Freemasonry:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cn4RpgfPFn0
We agree on most things, but not on abortion or the central solution.
I strongly support the right of a woman to do as she likes with her body. Once the infant is safely viable, it should be her option whether she keeps it or allows someone to adopt the child, but infanticide is a crime, not an option.
As a woman, no one can tell me what to do with my body and I am not the prisoner of a conception, nor should any other woman be.
The central solution cannot be accomplished unless and until we get our nations out of the UN Death Machine. That is why the Disengaging Entirely From the UN Debacle Act now begore the US Congress is so very important. You can take action here, https://PreventGenocide2030.org, and tell your contacts, friends and neighbors to, as well.
And thank you for your support.
Dr. Rima I do appreciate your insights on the Death Machine and how you have dedicated your life to exposing the depopulation agenda. Your interview with Jesse Ventura all those years ago was eye-opening.
However, I am a little confused by your position on abortion. You said that a woman can do what she likes with her body and no one can tell her what to do with it. But when the infant is safely viable--which occurs sooner and sooner during the course of pregnancy due to medical advances--you are saying that she has to allow the baby to be born because at that point terminating the pregnancy is infanticide. At that point, aren't you telling her what she can and can't do with her body? Doesn't that still make her a prisoner of conception? The only difference is the stage of development of the baby.
This is, for me, the thorny point of the argument. I am adamantly opposed to slavery of any sort, and condemning a woman to be a breeder because a conception has taken place inside her body would be enslaving her.
The fetus, not capable of external survival, has, in my view, and this is highly noxious to some people, I am aware, fewer rights than the woman.
Once the fetus is capable of external survival, killing it, as the WHO advocates, at the whim of the mother or, as California legislation makes possible, up to 28 days after birth, is no longer abortion (the mother's choice), it is infanticide.
So the mother would have a choice: deliver the viable infant prematurely, since the normal process of birth has not been initiated by the mother/baby duo or carry the baby to term and deliver then. In either of those cases, the choice is the mother's and the mother has the option after the viable infant is born, of either relinquishing parental rights (i.e., giving the baby up for adoption) or keeping the child.
There is no way that a woman would, in the world that I construct, be forced to carry a baby past healthy viability. That would, indeed, be slavery. But the moral imperative about the sanctity of the baby's life enters into the discussion once the baby is viable external to the mother without damage to the baby.
Bear in mind, of course, that keeping a baby alive with extraordinary measures when born significantly prematurely, while increasingly possible, is not what I mean by viable. Such babies are at much higher risk for life-long neurological and other damage. I am talking about normal expectation for respiratory, neurological, urological, digestive and other system function at a normal, expectable level.
Once that is achieved, the baby is, in my view, viable and now has the right to protection of its life in the way that we are discussing.
Thank you for reaffirming the reproductive rights of women!
Women all over the world should not be the prisoners of any conception.
Women all over the world should not be dictated to by anyone's religious beliefs about what they can do within their own bodily integrity.
If ppl don't begin to understand that we need to stand together against this globocap/UN Death Machine w/o debating religious beliefs imposed upon other ppl, we are all going down with the ship!
Yup! Exactly right.
As with political hatred, I will counter this every time I meet it. Others, both men and women, need to do the same.
Dr. Rima, I can't thank you enough for all the good things you do!
A woman can do whatever she wants with her body, except injuring/mutilating herself and committing suicide, right?
But since conception, there's a different living human being in her body, with his/her own DNA, sex, and immortal soul:
You'll start to find answers in Near Death Experiences. Consciousness, intelligence, will, are all spiritual properties of the spiritual immortal soul. How do we know that? some of the blind from birth see in colors for the first time when they are brain dead (no electricity, no activity, no bloodflow, no oxygen) and also no heartbeat and no breathing. The same happens with some of the deaf: they listen for the first time to conversations around or if they go up, even celestial music!
"God is love" says the Bible, the Word of God (1 John 4:7-12) Do you believe in love? then you believe in God. How do you prove love to yourself? If you prove love, you prove God! There’s no love without God, the source of all true love. He’s not only the love of my life, He’s the life of my love!
Jesus said “I’m... the life.” (John 14:16)
“God gives life to everything.” (1 Timothy 6, 13)
Do you believe in life? You prove life, you prove God, eternal life, source of all life:
https://www.openbible.info/topics/god_is_life
That is where you should start your journey of discovery, but first pray: "God, life of my love, if you exist, please show me the way to find the bliss of knowing You"
or even better:
Think this with your heart: “Jesus, if you are the Son of God, I consecrate my heart to your Heart. Please send me the Holy Spirit so I can see Truth and have the courage to convert and follow Him wherever He leads”
Mathematical proof of God’s mind
Who could have imagined that mathematical images could be so beautiful?:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlD2rcm971U
Movie Review: After Death
https://www.catholic365.com/article/32264/movie-review-after-death.html
Scientific proof of God and the soul:
http://www.catholic365.com/article/26227/scientific-proof-of-god-and-the-immortal-soul.html
Scientific proof of religion
https://www.quora.com/What-do-you-think-really-happens-after-we-die/answers/46502105
What do you believe comes after death (Science backs religion)?
https://www.quora.com/What-do-you-believe-comes-after-death/answer/Federico-A-Nazar
https://www.quora.com/What-do-you-think-really-happens-after-we-die/answers/46502105
Which Christian denomination is more Biblical?
https://www.quora.com/Which-is-the-true-Christianity-Protestantism-or-Catholicism/answer/Federico-A-Nazar
I'll be praying for all those who read this!
Blessings!
Fred
Hey, Prof, I am sure you mean well, but it is rather presumptuous to tell me where to "start my journey of discovery" and to tell me how and what to pray.
You have no data on which to base what I know or do not know simply because we disagree. And, to be very clear, while I respect your belief system, I do not agree with it.
Let me repeat: my body is not enslave-able because of a conception. If I choose to shelter that conception and invite a child to continue to live in that body, that is my right.
If I choose not to do so, that is my supervening right.
To me, that is essential health freedom: NO ONE can dictate what happens to my body or I am a slave. That is utterly binary: either yes or no. And for you, it is yes. For me it is no.
There is nothing in between.
We agree on much We disagree on that and will continue to do so unless and until you alter your position.
"You have no data": start from this paper
“there are characteristic features that are commonly observed in NDEs. These characteristics include a perception of seeing and hearing apart from the physical body, passing into or through a tunnel, encountering a mystical light, intense and generally positive emotions, a review of part or all of their prior life experiences, encountering deceased loved ones, and a choice to return to their earthly life.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172100/
5 peer reviewed experiences (among dozens):
https://www.magiscenter.com/blog/credible-near-death-experience-stories
Struck by lighting and came back from near-death to tell us about how we will be Judged:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xx5gCAmR4Ss
You define personhood from the moment of viability. That doesn't pass the test of being human with human rights:
1. Imagine you have an accident and you wouldn't be viable without ICU. Would that mean you lose personhood and human rights?
Now imagine the same accident 100 years ago: why would you be a person today and not then, considering you are the same living being?
2. The same argument applies to the unborn. Imagine in 100 years you could have external viability since conception (a perfect artificial uterus): it makes no philosophical sense to say that under the same level of development, an unborn baby is onthologycally, a living human being with human rights, depending only on the tech.
Even more evident. A 8 month pregnancy means there's no person in an Amazon jungle tribe, but there is a person in NYC?
Returning to the main topic, RFK2 and newcomers working together, like Ed Dowd, Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch, all share the same blind belief/creed that the COVID response problems were only due to business-as-usual involving regulatory capture. Suspiciously, they all reject conspiracy facts, the long haul explanation showing this was just one of many plandemics and vaccine attacks to cull the population, and that their real power started to grow exponentially when leaving the gold standard and counterfeiting currency1, trillions, with which they bought everything, puppeticians, listed stocks, land, etc. Unless they wake-up, they create dissent and debilitate the movement, because they don’t promote root-solutions, just palliative care. Our enemies are winning the war by exhausting us in skirmishes, while they advance behind and corner us to death.
No, Prof, you have no data about MY spiritual position, experience, awareness or involvement. Telling me where to start supposes you know where I am.
You don't.
And no one, no matter whom they might be to the world, to God or to the woman in whose body a conception has occurred, can tell the woman that someone else now owns her body and can use it against her will.
There are, at least in my mind, absolute, fundamental principles and the ultimate evil and unacceptability of slavery, reproductive or otherwise, is one of them.
Make all the arguments you like, but it ultimately comes down to that: are you willing to enslave women on your behalf or someone else's or are you not?
If you are, we have nothing further to discuss. If you are not, then you have no strength to your argument about reproductive slavery so we have nothing further to discuss in that regard, either.
I am willing to chat with you, but all of your arguments center around the willingness to countenance slavery. I don't.
It's not about slavery of the mother, but about due mercy. Imagine a female scientist in the North Pole living alone. A chopper leaves her the supplies.
Now, the little daughter of the scientist, who was staying with her father back home, had sneaked in the chopper and then into the base. The divorced father had custody because the scientist preferred to focus on her career, but the girl missed her mom. The chopper left. No way it could return until 9 months.
1. Does the scientist have a right to kick her daughter out of the base, causing her sure death?
2. Would keeping her daughter until the chopper's return mean that she is a slave of her daughter or the father?
3. Why is it that in every single country of the world, the scientist would be guilty of murder by abandoning her daughter, because abandoning anybody to death is a crime everywhere in the world and even worse if the person is a relative, and worst of worse, if the abandoned is a relative where you have obligation to care for, like a daughter or mother?
A definition of slavery is to treat a living human being like a thing.
Isn’t abortion a type of slavery, where the mother decides that a living human being is a thing and that she has the right to ask someone to stop the heart of the “thing”, which by the way is her daughter/son?
There no such thing as a "thing", when in time, the “thing” has a beating human heart, which could keep alive a human being!
So, in fact, being pro-abortion means being pro-slavery, and the real abolitionists are the pro-lifers. Pro-choice means choosing slavery, murder and genocide, in that order.
Fred, women are tired of ppl/men imposing their religious views upon their lives.
I am also tired of zealots like you turning discussions on substack into your personal rant abt what women should do, complete w bibl quotes of course.
This substack is abt Dr Rima's excellent reply to $teve K so why not stick to the subj?
BTW, there are many ways that ppl like you who care abt children can better utilize your energy like reorg foster care, expand adoption services, stop the questionable gender care surgeries on children.
Get out of your rut and do some work to help the living breathing children who are here now instead of worrying abt zygotes in women's wombs that are really not your bizness.
A girlfriend of my late wife simply cured her glaucoma in a couple of months with daily, bowel-tolerance intake of bioflavonoid vitamin C powder. Anecdotal, not clinical I know, but worthwhile info. I'm underwhelmed by allopathic approaches. And I see a game of opportunism with medicos rehashing Covid info and such.
So many Substack expert opinion types sell product. Everyone has to survive, but some stars like Mercola surely make more with their paywalls than they did before losing their practice. It seems a few diligent Substack researchers don't have time to make business on Substack. And over the past year or so, Substack seems to corral like-minded folks into echo chambers. Latypova's recent post re Stripe is disconcerting.
I ran across Substack about two years ago and find it enlightening after sorting the stacks for what I like. It's now my media. The Comment sections are amazing with interesting people and links, and few trolls. There's a handful of Stubstackers I'd like to monetize but I'm retired now on Social Security basically. You've joined this handful.
Just think, war resistance in the Vietnam era was virtually organized person to person, coffee shop to coffee shop, and by landline telephones, local pulps, and so forth, and finally began to intimidate Nixon. Shiva's offline approach with bumper stickers and fliers grabbed me as feasible and even necessary under increasing techno tyranny.
You fight from bottom up. You're a real rally the troops person. Your voice has the ring of experience and autonomy. I sent out the first missive I found of yours to my private e-blast of about a hundred and got positive response, hopefully bringing in some subscribers. Respect
Thank you, Rohjo! I am a rally the troops person. The troops are where the power is. The Generals are nothing without the power and loyalty of the troops.
Yes, humanity did not have the internet for most of its history and word from trusted person to trusted person is critically important.
You know, I closed my practice of drug free medicine, to which people came from around the world for my help, to take on, and derail the globalist depopulation and enslavement agenda in 2004.
This is NOT a good business plan, but it is a good plan to save humanity.
It is critically important to get our country out of the UN Death Machine, which you can do by supporting the Disengaging Entirely From the UN Debacle Act now before Congress. Go to https://PreventGenocide2030.org to do that and then share the link as far as you can.
Done. Sent to 110 people.
Btw, do you have a link to your podcast with Shiva? Changed my perception. I know Shiva followers I'd like to send it to.
When you say ‘cured her glaucoma’ what do you mean? Lowered her interocular pressure? Improved her visual fields? Thickened her optic nerve? I have had glaucoma for nearly 50 years. I am almost 100% convinced interocular pressures follow from glaucoma. They are not causative. IMO. I am not convinced lowering them is helpful.
PS I saw your interest in Ayurveda, which I share. Here's a clip from a friend in LA who salvaged her birthing experience by ignoring her doctors and heeding "studies out of India." Shannon is very active in all-faiths based advocacy of religious exemptions to the jab.
https://twitter.com/drshannonkroner/status/1757165785624301733
https://forunitedsolutions.org
Sorry I can't be more helpful. My wife passed away two years ago and I don't have her friend's contact. I remember that this person's vision cleared to her satisfaction, using only vitamin C. She was ecstatic to avoid other interventions, but I don't recall the details. I suppose a regimen of vit C might help you and couldn't hurt.
I am sorry for your loss. I hope her passing was easy. And I also hope you are well and happy.
Thanks. I attribute her passing to iatrogenesis, a common cause. I'm well and as happy as can be expected in this new crazy movie on the planet. All the best to you in your own journey. I think Ayurveda, Unani Tibb, classical Asian approaches, homeopathy, and folk practices are all antidotes to Rockefeller medicine.
Nice pair of visual input devices ya got there, Pilgrim...it'd sure be a damned shame if something was to happen to them...if you get my d(g)rift. For as little as a fiver per month I can offer ya protection. (Bugsy Malone channeling John Wayne in True Gri(f)t.)
Loved it, loved it!
If I ever post a comment that you'd rather have vanish, I'll be happy to cancel/delete it if you think its sarcasm or satire makes the risk/benefit ratio too high. Or just delete it on your own, if your Substack dashboard lets you do that.
E.g., go to 2:10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evj24bXakqg&t=349s
Love Monty Python, thanks! xx
Thank You for this post! Steve's level of greed is totally disgusting. May he reap his just reward. Or better yet may he change his ways. You Dr Rima are amazing
Thank you for saying this. I too am appalled that he put this eyesight saving news behind a paywall.
This is true.
"because once vision is lost, it can be very hard to restore.
Once retinal cells die they rarely if ever rejuvenate, but he claims that the supplements can restore vision. That’s selling false hope to millions who have lost eyesight from many disorders. I have worked in retinal ophthalmology since 1980 and with some of the best doctors in the field. Too bad I can’t read comments to see what he said, the product and whether people are falling for it.
I’m thoroughly disgusted with what he’s doing. Especially since he doesn’t need money.
Even if he did need money, this should be put out and then he should ask for donations if he wants to.
I once got a donation of a single very old, very often fingered $1 bill. With it, on a sheet of white paper was a grey wash, utterly magnificent drawing of a horse. Another piece of paper said, unsigned, "This is all I can give you but I want you to know how much what you are doing means to me."
That wasn't because of a paywall. That was a gift of inestimable value that touched General Bert and me deeply.
That was the most precious dollar I ever got.
How about if we use money like that, instead of as a tool of extortion, which is what Steve set up for his price-limited information.
I certainly cannot afford subscription to multiple substance. I just figure that both Kirsch and Malone are controlling the narrative behind their paywalls.
And trying damn hard to control it in front of their paywalls, too.
Beware the hand picked "alternative" voices. Where was Steve in 2009 when you flew in to warn Jessee Ventura about the nightmare of the past four years? Democrat party fundraising maybe. Still in Panama? New here. Welcome to substack Rima.
Thanks, Good!
I do not know where he was then but I know where we are now and if we are not focused on getting out of the UN Death Machine, we are acquiescing to our destruction.
Go to https://PreventGenocide2030.org and take the action there in support of the Act before Congress to get us out of that slaughter house.
It's right on the home page. Then share like crazy.
100% agreed! Not a Malone fan either. These guys are $$ hores who like to act like heroes & know it alls. Narcissistic.
At the very least. I think narcissism is the least of it. That is just personal pathology. These guys are far more damaging than that.
I have felt the same way about substack subscriptions and inability to comment without paying for it. I keep mine free for that reason. I will have to charge for my book which is customary for such a product and fair I think, for how much work goes into it.
I quit my healthcare job over the jabs, I have no money for subscriptions either.
🔥 Have always admired your bravery.
All it takes is poor social judgement! LOL!
I remember Kirsch proudly stating on his Twitter account how he offered a lady on a plane that was sitting next to him 10K on the spot if she took off her mask. I personally found it creepy...
Do what I say and I will give you money. Want what I know and you will give me money.
To add insult to injury, it is not even his information: he heard it at a dinner party!!!!!! FFS!
Which is dumb anyway. Diseases come and go, flare up/flare down. People eat four bananas one day and if their medical test says their pressures were less they tell people ‘I think eating a lot of bananas really helped my interocular pressures’.
Have I told you lately that I love you? No? Well, I really, really do.
Steve Kirsch attracted my attention early on in my work here on Substack. I realised he was a weird combination of grifter, authoritarian and controlled opposition operative.
He is protecting his industry and his millions. I find him quite repugnant for many reasons but concealing useful information behind paywalls is especially vile.
Thank you so much for giving him the benefit of your fantastic advice. You are ever the mistress of subtlety and pointed education in morality. xx
Unsubscribed a long time ago from his unpaid substack. He is controlled opposition just like Malone in my opinion. Both super rich men. Part of the new dream team of pharma pushers along with other drs. Steve believed in vaccines and probably still wants safe ones just like RFK Jr. Bret Weinstein is another one. Can't stand him. In his Tucker interview, he was trying to talk briefly about WHO and UN and about their control and that we need to leave. Everywhere I could I said Dr Rima and James are the ones that deserve credit for telling the world for almost 2 years, not Bret. The group that everyone wants to hate, big pharma, they all push so much. Ivermectin is a pharma drug. George Webb has some interesting information on Malone. Thanks Dr Rima for speaking the truth.
Discerning who is worthy of attention and who is not is very important. This is a highly penetrated movement, to say the least.
Thanks for the kudos, but it does not matter who gets credit. What matters is that we get out.
https://PreventGenocide2030.org - take the action there supporting the bills before Congress to get us out.
The REAL Robert Malone, son of a Deep State:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-real-robert-malone
Wow, what a list of proof. Incredible work. You should contact George Webb too and I question him too, btw. He took one of the vaccines which stunned his audience. He is on The Duke show with Peter a lot whom didn't take the vaccine. I had all my alerts out about people in 2020 as I was too aware of the agenda. So I questioned everything and still do. I don't really follow anybody, but some journalists that I knew before covid and some podcasts people now about the constitution. I am learning as much as possible about the constitution and how we can use it to our benefit. My journey started because of cancer and my daughters and son having too many health issues that I never imagined . Later my husband almost died from too many meds a dr prescribed. I have very little respect for big pharma or anybody pushing it. I have recently learned a bunch of truth about alternative meds too that stunned me. It's a man that does substack articles too. The world is truly upside down and I want to live my life as free as possible. Thank you and keep up the great work.
Thank you Minkat! The whole world is claiming freedom! I'll be posting concrete things anyone can do for the cause.