Guilty as [Not] Charged. Q1: Who Owns the Damn Flag? Q2: What's the Difference Between "Globalist", "Robber Baron", "Oligarch", "Destructigarch" and "Tyrant"?
Guilty as [Not] Charged. Q1: Who Owns the Damn Flag? Q2: What's the Difference Between "Globalist", "Robber Baron", "Oligarch", "Destructigarch" and "Tyrant"?
We are living in a tragic and deadly geopolitical theatrical show. Who wrote the script? Who commissioned it? Who hired (and pays) the actors? Why? Let's Talk About It.
I guess you could say that for all the crats....that being said it seems to be a utilization of technocrats along side of globalists and psychopaths who are ruining the show.
Yes, let's please stop falling for the same trick over and over again.
Fortunately I think it's so insane and anti-human that LIFE won't allow the end of this show to go as written. Already falling apart.
Once enough of us grok our own power and ability to rewrite the script, things will get interesting in a good direction. I hope I'm here to see it. Thanks for your work. Best.
Gates and his ilk often take very good ideas and use them to give legitimacy to very bad ideas.
Giving women access to birth control is not evil because Gates wants to do it. He wants to do it to reduce populations, not give women reproductive freedom.
Kangaroo care is not insanity at all. It has been used in NICUs for 40 years with great success.
True "contraception" (the prevention of fertilization that would create a new and distinct human life) is not synonymous with "birth control" or "reproductive services" (often code words for abortion). I see no moral distinction between the evils of pre-birth depopulation and post-birth depopulation.
Preventing fertilization is not a moral evil, because a new human life is never created. But, once a new human life is created at the moment of fertilization, I believe ending that life becomes a moral evil.
Most {not all) “birth control” and “reproductive services” do not strictly prevent fertilization. Instead, they end a new human life (created at the moment of fertilization) at various stages of development. Then, for many people (not me) it becomes a subjective judgment as to the humanity of that life that determines whether they believe it deserves protection or not: it’s size, age, look, genetics, whether it can live outside the womb, whether it is wanted, etc.
I submit that THIS is post-fertilization, pre-birth depopulation.
I see what you are espousing, but I do not agree with it. However, as long as you do not try to impose your beliefs on others and retain them for their impact on your life and those you agree to share that belief system with, that's great.
But imposing that on others would be something that I would oppose you on.
Don't forget "technocrats"
I am pretty sure you can be a technocrat without trying to kill most of, and control all of, the world.
I guess you could say that for all the crats....that being said it seems to be a utilization of technocrats along side of globalists and psychopaths who are ruining the show.
Q1:
The Flag is a Symbol of Freedom and the right to burn the Flag - Bill Hicks
Q2:
Same shit... different packaging
-
Look at Germany 100 years ago...
Then look ar the now.
A mirror image mirrored in time.
RUSSEL-JAY; GOULD OWNS THE DAMN FLAG NOW
HE SAVED US AND THEY DAMN NEAR KILLED HIM WHILE HE WAS DOING IT
THIS IS WHY A CLEAN UP IS GOING ON- THEY LOST THE FLAG- THEY LOST CONTROL
THEY LOST EVERYTHING EVEN THE MILITARY
Illuminati. Luciferians.
Bankers not Marx originated communism.
You tell it like it is Dr Rima screw them all
I try. Thank you.
The American flag of peace has stripes going vertical.
Great read!
Yes, let's please stop falling for the same trick over and over again.
Fortunately I think it's so insane and anti-human that LIFE won't allow the end of this show to go as written. Already falling apart.
Once enough of us grok our own power and ability to rewrite the script, things will get interesting in a good direction. I hope I'm here to see it. Thanks for your work. Best.
Dear Rima,
can you please look at this:
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2024/09/eu-contraceptive-maternal-health
and this insanity from Boy-child-G ates?:
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/articles/partners-india-kangaroos
What is your problem with these ideas?
Gates and his ilk often take very good ideas and use them to give legitimacy to very bad ideas.
Giving women access to birth control is not evil because Gates wants to do it. He wants to do it to reduce populations, not give women reproductive freedom.
Kangaroo care is not insanity at all. It has been used in NICUs for 40 years with great success.
True "contraception" (the prevention of fertilization that would create a new and distinct human life) is not synonymous with "birth control" or "reproductive services" (often code words for abortion). I see no moral distinction between the evils of pre-birth depopulation and post-birth depopulation.
Wait, so you are saying that preventing fertilization is a moral evil, or did I misunderstand what you mean?
Let me clarify then:
Preventing fertilization is not a moral evil, because a new human life is never created. But, once a new human life is created at the moment of fertilization, I believe ending that life becomes a moral evil.
Most {not all) “birth control” and “reproductive services” do not strictly prevent fertilization. Instead, they end a new human life (created at the moment of fertilization) at various stages of development. Then, for many people (not me) it becomes a subjective judgment as to the humanity of that life that determines whether they believe it deserves protection or not: it’s size, age, look, genetics, whether it can live outside the womb, whether it is wanted, etc.
I submit that THIS is post-fertilization, pre-birth depopulation.
I see what you are espousing, but I do not agree with it. However, as long as you do not try to impose your beliefs on others and retain them for their impact on your life and those you agree to share that belief system with, that's great.
But imposing that on others would be something that I would oppose you on.
Are you saying that you believe it is not a moral evil to end human life at certain stages? And if so, do you have a basis for that belief system?