Violating/enslaving/raping women is patriarchy-speak for "I won. Your woman is mine. You are too weak to do anything about it. Thus, woman commodified, transcended, transgendered, erased
Whether one believes it, or not, God created the man, Adam, and the woman, Eve, who became husband and wife, and were given sexual organs in order to procreate so mankind could multiply and populate the earth to bring glory and honour to the Creator, God.
The knowledge we cannot escape is that Satan is the evil entity who is the author of all evil. The Bible teaches mankind sinned and fell short of the glory of God when it was captured by Satan, that old serpent, in the Garden of Eden.
Only two genders exist in the human race, in animals, and even plants. This reality has not only been confirmed through scientific observation, but the Bible since the beginning of creation has also confirmed this. Anyone who argues against this obvious reality, with claims there are more than two genders, is either very deceived, or they are deliberately hostile and at war with God.
Thanks for sharing your view. I agree wholeheartedly with your statement that there are only two genders.
The bible part, not so much, since that is a matter of faith and belief. But we can certainly see the reality of the science.
Some species of plants and animals have the capacity to self-fertilize and produce young either parthenogenically (only one gender involved in the reproduction) or hermaphroditically (Species member can function as both genders at the same time) BUT there are still only two genders.
Anything else is insanity designed for political manipulation.
Your quote: "The bible part, not so much, since that is a matter of faith and belief. But we can certainly see the reality of the science." The Bible part is, of course, a "matter of faith and belief", no doubt, but its not segregated from the reality of what is called science. The direct study of the physical world was never an official discipline until men with curious ideals and enquiring minds decided to observe and research the functions of nature, hence, the mechanics of the universe. As more interest grew for research and experimentation of the physical world (physics), science, so labeled, led to what we have today and it honestly does not look good. I'm sure you will agree.
Resulting from scientific research and development, humans have designed weapons of mass destruction mechanically, electrically, chemically, etc., such as: mechanical achievements (swords, spears, guns, bullets, bombs, projectiles [nuclear warheads], etc.); electrical achievements (lazer and pulse powered electro-magnetic weapons, 5g, AI technology, microchip implants into the human body, etc.); chemical achievements (gunpowder, atomic combinations for nuclear fusion, toxic medicine [oral and injectable {vaccines}], crop sprays, dispersion of chemicals into the atmosphere via aircraft [chem-trails], GMO foods, etc.); and the list goes on of things one is still unaware of in development. I am not against discoveries that are claimed scientific—discoveries of which were always or already in existence to begin with and required unlocking, but what I am very much against is the evil applied to those discoveries for development of destructive implements.
A personal note. I have a strong argument that the beast it is read of found in the book of Revelation 13, and elsewhere in Scripture, may very well be an AI generated robot. There is a strong likelihood that replicas of this AI robotic beast will be located in every city, 15 minute cities, around the world. If all this should unfold, I foresee these robotic beasts activated from a control center, that will give instructions to humans in captivity to the dictatorial or autocratic system in these cities, to command worship of the beast. In order to buy and sell, people will be required to take a mark on their right hand or forehead. This is interesting to note as we enter the stage where digital currency, now in its infancy, gains momentum and fiat currency is phased out. If you are not already aware of Revelation 13, then take a look.
Getting back to the dialogue on faith. Faith goes hand in hand with belief. It is the mechanism one is given to connect with God, which He expects everyone make use of. "By faith we are saved through grace, not by works lest we have something to boast about" (Ephesians 2:8). This is the passage of Scripture that revolutionised Protestants during the Reformation between 1500—1600 AD to dismember themselves from Rome. Hope you are not Roman Catholic otherwise you may think I'm trying proselytize you. 😁
Whatever branch of science there is, whether formal, natural, social, or applied, and the mysteries that have been unlocked from them through scientific observation, this I think should be applauded to give God glory and honour, because all the attributes discovered through scienfific exploration can ultimately all be found in God's Word, as well as the mysteries surrounding the attributes that have not been unlocked yet. I believe one can find all the scientific evidence they are looking for in the pages of the Bible.
In an interesting passage of Scripture, of which there are many, there is found in John 12:23-26 where Jesus explains in a parable of a seed planted in the ground, and discloses that unless the seed dies it cannot germinate and bear fruit. Jesus did not need to discover what modern science has confirmed to be true, He designed and created it that way.
When science turns into religion, it can then become dangerous as the incumbent geneflects at its feet. If an unhealthy obsession ensues from scientific research, it leads to Satan deceiving the person by further attempts to destroy humankind using science for the nefarious objective, that is: science to advance evil. As I have already mentioned, and further elaborate, the evil most commonly obvious to us of late is biological warfare weapons devoloped in laboratories and dispersed atmospherically by way of viruses, poison chemicals sprayed from aircraft (chem-trails), poison sprayed on crops; poison via inoculation; genetically modified food developed in laboratories, toxic medication, etc.
As this has direct effect upon all of us, what effect has it on the cabal attempting to destroy us? How do they escape being infected? Do they have an antidote? Apparently they do! The scientist, Ralph Baric, constructing pathogens from animals in the laboratory at the university in North Carolina, Chapel Hill, takes pathogens and makes them more infectious to infect humans. He has also made the antidote.
I heard something interesting about underground bunkers the cabal are building for themselves, so when the paw-paw hits the fan, they have an escape route. Some of these psychos have contracts with Elon Musk, who owns a company that digs tunnels underground, to construct these bunkers for them. I heard a message from a preacher who related the cabal's endeavour to build underground bunkers so they can escape what Revelation 6:12-17 says.
Microscopy has revealed unusual blood clots found in the bloodstream of a person after a Covid-19 shot, and have related it to many who have recently suffered from myocarditis. If you are unaware of an investigation that was done by MD Ryan Cole, Ana Mihalcea, and others, what they found is massive clots of a synthetic origin restricting blood flow in patients following inoculation of the Covid-19 vaccine. The clots are believed to be the result of hydrogel present in the vaccine that has absorbent properties, that not only dehydrates the blood which absorbent polymers can do, but the polymer becomes enlarged in size to form massive clots.
This is the degree of evil the world is faced with!
If a person’s gender is a result of accepted cultural reproduction from a chain of previous models, it can explain how the existence of binary gender roles can be reconciled, with each gender displaying both variation within cultures and change over time. Although each member of a gender is reproduced within a historical lineage that can be traced back to different models of gender, the lineage need not sustain all or even most properties originally associated with either of the binary models. At the same time, the binary lineages are maintained insofar as whenever each branch of gender undergoes change, a relevant binary contrast or “cultural dimorphism” is maintained between the two lineages. In other words, as long as neither gender becomes extinct (that is, the terms “women” or “man” refers to an empty set), significantly branches off from a lineage, or merges with the other, gender remains a binary matter and it is patterned in two distinct ways.
It might also seem that the unity of a gender simply follows from the shared reproductive history of each lineage. The idea of continuity amongst members is attained through a lineage of reproduction that has remained sufficiently “intact” over time and has avoided merging, extinction or considerable branching-off. But this conclusion is arrived at too hastily. The claim so far is only about gendered reproduction regardless of the number of original models. I have already flagged a worry that pervasive binary gender systems are not necessarily traceable back to common models (as in the case of War and Peace), now I turn to this worry more explicitly.
Beyond binary systems of gender
If gender is a historical kind, then it should be clear that the current binary gender system need not necessarily have unfolded in a binary manner. In fact, I have shown just how contingent this system is on two features of reproduction: an existing cultural niche with binary models and the existence of gender-based social learning.
Indeed, given the view of gender as binary cultural lineages one can see that there are three different ways in which a culture can depart from having binary genders. First, the binary lineages might merge at some point, or one or both genders might cease to exist. Second, it may be that the original gender models were never binary at all (perhaps they were three or even more). Third, new alternative genders may emerge either because an existing lineage has locally branched off into one or more new gender lineages, or due to the partial merging of the two lineages into three.
Nope. I am not buying this gobbledygook. Gender IS binary. You can make up fancy words like "gender as binary cultural lineages" and the like but they mean nothing.
Gender is determined by genetics. Genetic gender comes in XX and XY. That's all you get.
Love whom you want, do any kind of dress that makes you feel good, but if you are XYyou were a boy and you become a man. If you are XX you were a girl and you become a woman.
Inborn errors of metabolism like XXX are problems, not a definition of normality.
People are born with cleft pallets. That does not define normal structure.
You cannot make up science.
And nobody is born in the wrong body. That's a delusion. You can convince people of crazy things but it does not make those things true.
Whether one believes it, or not, God created the man, Adam, and the woman, Eve, who became husband and wife, and were given sexual organs in order to procreate so mankind could multiply and populate the earth to bring glory and honour to the Creator, God.
The knowledge we cannot escape is that Satan is the evil entity who is the author of all evil. The Bible teaches mankind sinned and fell short of the glory of God when it was captured by Satan, that old serpent, in the Garden of Eden.
Only two genders exist in the human race, in animals, and even plants. This reality has not only been confirmed through scientific observation, but the Bible since the beginning of creation has also confirmed this. Anyone who argues against this obvious reality, with claims there are more than two genders, is either very deceived, or they are deliberately hostile and at war with God.
Thanks for sharing your view. I agree wholeheartedly with your statement that there are only two genders.
The bible part, not so much, since that is a matter of faith and belief. But we can certainly see the reality of the science.
Some species of plants and animals have the capacity to self-fertilize and produce young either parthenogenically (only one gender involved in the reproduction) or hermaphroditically (Species member can function as both genders at the same time) BUT there are still only two genders.
Anything else is insanity designed for political manipulation.
On that we both agree.
Good day!
Your quote: "The bible part, not so much, since that is a matter of faith and belief. But we can certainly see the reality of the science." The Bible part is, of course, a "matter of faith and belief", no doubt, but its not segregated from the reality of what is called science. The direct study of the physical world was never an official discipline until men with curious ideals and enquiring minds decided to observe and research the functions of nature, hence, the mechanics of the universe. As more interest grew for research and experimentation of the physical world (physics), science, so labeled, led to what we have today and it honestly does not look good. I'm sure you will agree.
Resulting from scientific research and development, humans have designed weapons of mass destruction mechanically, electrically, chemically, etc., such as: mechanical achievements (swords, spears, guns, bullets, bombs, projectiles [nuclear warheads], etc.); electrical achievements (lazer and pulse powered electro-magnetic weapons, 5g, AI technology, microchip implants into the human body, etc.); chemical achievements (gunpowder, atomic combinations for nuclear fusion, toxic medicine [oral and injectable {vaccines}], crop sprays, dispersion of chemicals into the atmosphere via aircraft [chem-trails], GMO foods, etc.); and the list goes on of things one is still unaware of in development. I am not against discoveries that are claimed scientific—discoveries of which were always or already in existence to begin with and required unlocking, but what I am very much against is the evil applied to those discoveries for development of destructive implements.
A personal note. I have a strong argument that the beast it is read of found in the book of Revelation 13, and elsewhere in Scripture, may very well be an AI generated robot. There is a strong likelihood that replicas of this AI robotic beast will be located in every city, 15 minute cities, around the world. If all this should unfold, I foresee these robotic beasts activated from a control center, that will give instructions to humans in captivity to the dictatorial or autocratic system in these cities, to command worship of the beast. In order to buy and sell, people will be required to take a mark on their right hand or forehead. This is interesting to note as we enter the stage where digital currency, now in its infancy, gains momentum and fiat currency is phased out. If you are not already aware of Revelation 13, then take a look.
Getting back to the dialogue on faith. Faith goes hand in hand with belief. It is the mechanism one is given to connect with God, which He expects everyone make use of. "By faith we are saved through grace, not by works lest we have something to boast about" (Ephesians 2:8). This is the passage of Scripture that revolutionised Protestants during the Reformation between 1500—1600 AD to dismember themselves from Rome. Hope you are not Roman Catholic otherwise you may think I'm trying proselytize you. 😁
Whatever branch of science there is, whether formal, natural, social, or applied, and the mysteries that have been unlocked from them through scientific observation, this I think should be applauded to give God glory and honour, because all the attributes discovered through scienfific exploration can ultimately all be found in God's Word, as well as the mysteries surrounding the attributes that have not been unlocked yet. I believe one can find all the scientific evidence they are looking for in the pages of the Bible.
In an interesting passage of Scripture, of which there are many, there is found in John 12:23-26 where Jesus explains in a parable of a seed planted in the ground, and discloses that unless the seed dies it cannot germinate and bear fruit. Jesus did not need to discover what modern science has confirmed to be true, He designed and created it that way.
When science turns into religion, it can then become dangerous as the incumbent geneflects at its feet. If an unhealthy obsession ensues from scientific research, it leads to Satan deceiving the person by further attempts to destroy humankind using science for the nefarious objective, that is: science to advance evil. As I have already mentioned, and further elaborate, the evil most commonly obvious to us of late is biological warfare weapons devoloped in laboratories and dispersed atmospherically by way of viruses, poison chemicals sprayed from aircraft (chem-trails), poison sprayed on crops; poison via inoculation; genetically modified food developed in laboratories, toxic medication, etc.
As this has direct effect upon all of us, what effect has it on the cabal attempting to destroy us? How do they escape being infected? Do they have an antidote? Apparently they do! The scientist, Ralph Baric, constructing pathogens from animals in the laboratory at the university in North Carolina, Chapel Hill, takes pathogens and makes them more infectious to infect humans. He has also made the antidote.
I heard something interesting about underground bunkers the cabal are building for themselves, so when the paw-paw hits the fan, they have an escape route. Some of these psychos have contracts with Elon Musk, who owns a company that digs tunnels underground, to construct these bunkers for them. I heard a message from a preacher who related the cabal's endeavour to build underground bunkers so they can escape what Revelation 6:12-17 says.
Microscopy has revealed unusual blood clots found in the bloodstream of a person after a Covid-19 shot, and have related it to many who have recently suffered from myocarditis. If you are unaware of an investigation that was done by MD Ryan Cole, Ana Mihalcea, and others, what they found is massive clots of a synthetic origin restricting blood flow in patients following inoculation of the Covid-19 vaccine. The clots are believed to be the result of hydrogel present in the vaccine that has absorbent properties, that not only dehydrates the blood which absorbent polymers can do, but the polymer becomes enlarged in size to form massive clots.
This is the degree of evil the world is faced with!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5943372/
If a person’s gender is a result of accepted cultural reproduction from a chain of previous models, it can explain how the existence of binary gender roles can be reconciled, with each gender displaying both variation within cultures and change over time. Although each member of a gender is reproduced within a historical lineage that can be traced back to different models of gender, the lineage need not sustain all or even most properties originally associated with either of the binary models. At the same time, the binary lineages are maintained insofar as whenever each branch of gender undergoes change, a relevant binary contrast or “cultural dimorphism” is maintained between the two lineages. In other words, as long as neither gender becomes extinct (that is, the terms “women” or “man” refers to an empty set), significantly branches off from a lineage, or merges with the other, gender remains a binary matter and it is patterned in two distinct ways.
It might also seem that the unity of a gender simply follows from the shared reproductive history of each lineage. The idea of continuity amongst members is attained through a lineage of reproduction that has remained sufficiently “intact” over time and has avoided merging, extinction or considerable branching-off. But this conclusion is arrived at too hastily. The claim so far is only about gendered reproduction regardless of the number of original models. I have already flagged a worry that pervasive binary gender systems are not necessarily traceable back to common models (as in the case of War and Peace), now I turn to this worry more explicitly.
Beyond binary systems of gender
If gender is a historical kind, then it should be clear that the current binary gender system need not necessarily have unfolded in a binary manner. In fact, I have shown just how contingent this system is on two features of reproduction: an existing cultural niche with binary models and the existence of gender-based social learning.
Indeed, given the view of gender as binary cultural lineages one can see that there are three different ways in which a culture can depart from having binary genders. First, the binary lineages might merge at some point, or one or both genders might cease to exist. Second, it may be that the original gender models were never binary at all (perhaps they were three or even more). Third, new alternative genders may emerge either because an existing lineage has locally branched off into one or more new gender lineages, or due to the partial merging of the two lineages into three.
Nope. I am not buying this gobbledygook. Gender IS binary. You can make up fancy words like "gender as binary cultural lineages" and the like but they mean nothing.
Gender is determined by genetics. Genetic gender comes in XX and XY. That's all you get.
Love whom you want, do any kind of dress that makes you feel good, but if you are XYyou were a boy and you become a man. If you are XX you were a girl and you become a woman.
Inborn errors of metabolism like XXX are problems, not a definition of normality.
People are born with cleft pallets. That does not define normal structure.
You cannot make up science.
And nobody is born in the wrong body. That's a delusion. You can convince people of crazy things but it does not make those things true.